<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital kids and the death of email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/</link>
	<description>intrepid girl reporter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/comment-page-1/#comment-60131</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/#comment-60131</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much of a risk to email.  Email has a few giant advantages that social networks just can&#039;t compete with:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  Nobody owns it.  MySpace, Facebook are all at whim of their owners.  They can be snooped, modified, crippled, disabled, limited, etc.&lt;br&gt;2.  Email is secure.  Email can be done 100% internal (Exchange) or external.&lt;br&gt;3.  Email is manageable.  It can be sent to many devices, filters, storage mechanisms.  MySpace, Facebook, etc. are all 100% web based, and the org (or individual has no control).&lt;br&gt;4.  Email is universal.  This STILL isn&#039;t the case with IM.  You still can&#039;t IM across networks.  Social networks have the same thing.  No 1 will become dominant.  Hasn&#039;t happened for search after all those years, not for IM, ISP, or anything else they predicted will have 1 winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much of a risk to email.  Email has a few giant advantages that social networks just can&#8217;t compete with:</p>
<p>1.  Nobody owns it.  MySpace, Facebook are all at whim of their owners.  They can be snooped, modified, crippled, disabled, limited, etc.<br />2.  Email is secure.  Email can be done 100% internal (Exchange) or external.<br />3.  Email is manageable.  It can be sent to many devices, filters, storage mechanisms.  MySpace, Facebook, etc. are all 100% web based, and the org (or individual has no control).<br />4.  Email is universal.  This STILL isn&#8217;t the case with IM.  You still can&#8217;t IM across networks.  Social networks have the same thing.  No 1 will become dominant.  Hasn&#8217;t happened for search after all those years, not for IM, ISP, or anything else they predicted will have 1 winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/comment-page-1/#comment-36839</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/#comment-36839</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much of a risk to email.  Email has a few giant advantages that social networks just can&#039;t compete with:

1.  Nobody owns it.  MySpace, Facebook are all at whim of their owners.  They can be snooped, modified, crippled, disabled, limited, etc.
2.  Email is secure.  Email can be done 100% internal (Exchange) or external.
3.  Email is manageable.  It can be sent to many devices, filters, storage mechanisms.  MySpace, Facebook, etc. are all 100% web based, and the org (or individual has no control).
4.  Email is universal.  This STILL isn&#039;t the case with IM.  You still can&#039;t IM across networks.  Social networks have the same thing.  No 1 will become dominant.  Hasn&#039;t happened for search after all those years, not for IM, ISP, or anything else they predicted will have 1 winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much of a risk to email.  Email has a few giant advantages that social networks just can&#8217;t compete with:</p>
<p>1.  Nobody owns it.  MySpace, Facebook are all at whim of their owners.  They can be snooped, modified, crippled, disabled, limited, etc.<br />
2.  Email is secure.  Email can be done 100% internal (Exchange) or external.<br />
3.  Email is manageable.  It can be sent to many devices, filters, storage mechanisms.  MySpace, Facebook, etc. are all 100% web based, and the org (or individual has no control).<br />
4.  Email is universal.  This STILL isn&#8217;t the case with IM.  You still can&#8217;t IM across networks.  Social networks have the same thing.  No 1 will become dominant.  Hasn&#8217;t happened for search after all those years, not for IM, ISP, or anything else they predicted will have 1 winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
