<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Photoblogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/</link>
	<description>intrepid girl reporter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dria</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/comment-page-1/#comment-60302</link>
		<dc:creator>dria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/?p=233#comment-60302</guid>
		<description>This can be true, but in this particular case, there are things that DSLRs can do that my current camera can&#039;t.  I miss, so much, the basic camera features of manual focus rings and a depth-of-field preview button.  Until I bought a digital camera, I never had autofocus.  Now I have a camera that theoretically has manual focus, but I can&#039;t seem to ever get the precision I want out of it.  The result is that I end up using auto-focus 100% of the time, and, as a result, blowing about 30% of the photos I take because the stupid machine focused on the wrong thing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just really miss my old manual cameras, but I also have zero interest in using regular film.  It&#039;s a frustrating little dichotomy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be true, but in this particular case, there are things that DSLRs can do that my current camera can&#8217;t.  I miss, so much, the basic camera features of manual focus rings and a depth-of-field preview button.  Until I bought a digital camera, I never had autofocus.  Now I have a camera that theoretically has manual focus, but I can&#8217;t seem to ever get the precision I want out of it.  The result is that I end up using auto-focus 100% of the time, and, as a result, blowing about 30% of the photos I take because the stupid machine focused on the wrong thing.</p>
<p>I just really miss my old manual cameras, but I also have zero interest in using regular film.  It&#8217;s a frustrating little dichotomy right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graydon</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/comment-page-1/#comment-60301</link>
		<dc:creator>graydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/?p=233#comment-60301</guid>
		<description>often in arts (rather than business), you are focusing on improving your craft (rather than your product), so bad tools make you a better artist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>often in arts (rather than business), you are focusing on improving your craft (rather than your product), so bad tools make you a better artist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dria</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>dria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/?p=233#comment-121</guid>
		<description>This can be true, but in this particular case, there are things that DSLRs can do that my current camera can&#039;t.  I miss, so much, the basic camera features of manual focus rings and a depth-of-field preview button.  Until I bought a digital camera, I never had autofocus.  Now I have a camera that theoretically has manual focus, but I can&#039;t seem to ever get the precision I want out of it.  The result is that I end up using auto-focus 100% of the time, and, as a result, blowing about 30% of the photos I take because the stupid machine focused on the wrong thing.

I just really miss my old manual cameras, but I also have zero interest in using regular film.  It&#039;s a frustrating little dichotomy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can be true, but in this particular case, there are things that DSLRs can do that my current camera can&#8217;t.  I miss, so much, the basic camera features of manual focus rings and a depth-of-field preview button.  Until I bought a digital camera, I never had autofocus.  Now I have a camera that theoretically has manual focus, but I can&#8217;t seem to ever get the precision I want out of it.  The result is that I end up using auto-focus 100% of the time, and, as a result, blowing about 30% of the photos I take because the stupid machine focused on the wrong thing.</p>
<p>I just really miss my old manual cameras, but I also have zero interest in using regular film.  It&#8217;s a frustrating little dichotomy right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graydon</title>
		<link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2005/06/14/233/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>graydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/?p=233#comment-119</guid>
		<description>often in arts (rather than business), you are focusing on improving your craft (rather than your product), so bad tools make you a better artist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>often in arts (rather than business), you are focusing on improving your craft (rather than your product), so bad tools make you a better artist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

